UNIverse - Public Research Portal
Profile Photo

Prof. Dr. Miriam Locher

Department of Languages and Literatures
Profiles & Affiliations

Resesarch interests

  • interpersonal pragmatics and relational work
  • pragmatics of fiction and relational work
  • Pragmatics of fiction in translation and subtitling
  • language and politeness/impoliteness
  • language and power
  • language and disagreement
  • language and advice
  • language and emotions
  • narratives in oral and written form
  • computer-mediated discourse
  • Internet health communication (especially advice columns on health topics)
  • medical humanities


ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-7388

Scopus: ID=16238998600

Google Scholar


Selected Publications

Locher, Miriam A., & Messerli, Thomas C. (2024). “What Does Hyung Mean Please?”: Moments of Teaching and Learning About Korean (Im)politeness on an Online Streaming Platform of Korean TV Drama. In Kim, Mary Shin (ed.), Exploring Korean Politeness Across Online and Offline Interactions (pp. 121–154). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50698-7_6

URLs
URLs

Dayter, Daria, Locher, Miriam A., & Messerli, Thomas C. (2023). Pragmatics in Translation: Mediality, participation and relational work. In Elements in Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009261210

URLs
URLs

Landert, Daniela, Dayter, Daria, Messerli, Thomas C., & Locher, Miriam A. (2023). Corpus Pragmatics. In Elements in Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009091107

URLs
URLs

Locher, Miriam A., Jucker, Andreas H., Landert, Daniela, & Messerli, Thomas C. (2023). Fiction and Pragmatics. In Elements in Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009091688

URLs
URLs

Locher, Miriam A. (2020). Moments of relational work in English fan translations of Korean TV drama. Journal of pragmatics, 170, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.08.002

URLs
URLs

Selected Projects & Collaborations

Project cover
Project cover

Language and health online

Research Project  | 3 Project Members

This linguistic project investigates e(lectronic)-health interaction in asynchronous, written computer-mediated communication. By exploring this interface from a particularly linguistic perspective, we endeavor to contribute to a better understanding of e-health practices. The project consists of two parts: "Persuasion in smoking cessation online" and "Relational work in email counseling", which pursue joined as well as individual research questions. In the last decades the Internet has evolved to become an important source of information for health concerns (cf. Richardson 2005). There are many professional information sites, peer-support sites for patients, mailing lists, etc. This makes online health communication an important research field for different disciplines. The linguistic study of online health practices sheds light on how language is used to create meaningful exchanges between professionals and patients and between lay people. A linguist study of these practices is especially pertinent because e-health is predominantly a written mode, relying crucially on language. We are focusing on two areas of health practices that share an element of persuasion: Anti-smoking campaigns and smoking cessation help sites as well as email therapy contain aspects of "attempt[ing] to evoke a specific change in the attitudes or behaviors of an audience", which is the definition of persuasion provided by Jowett et al. (1999: 28). We wish to study these 'sites of persuasion' as an interactive process from a linguistic perspective. Professional health Internet sites usually have either a mandate to inform and enlighten a particular target population (cf. e.g. the national and governmental sites) and/or they have the clear aim to contribute to risk prevention and change in behavior of the target group. In a similar vein, online therapists strive to help their patients find their way through a problem by means of the 'talking cure', although - crucially for our project - carried out in the written mode. Language is thus exploited for persuasion to achieve these goals. While persuasive strategies on smoking cessation might be expected to be more straightforward than in the non-directive genre of therapy, it is our goal to learn what linguistic persuasion strategies emerge in the different practices. Our methodological approach is positioned within interactional discourse analysis in that we study language in use and wish to explore the variation that we encounter. We are particularly interested in interpersonal pragmatics, i.e. the study of language in use that focuses on the relational side of the practices involved. A combination of the study of the relational aspect of language with language use for persuasive means is an important combination for our research of e-health communication. It is important to stress that we are going to operationalize persuasion by looking at linguistic surface strategies as found in the practices that contain a persuasive orientation rather than looking at psychological effects of persuasive acts in the readers. To investigate the interactive process of persuasion in the frames of smoking cessation and therapeutic discourse, we will address the following overarching questions: (1) What characteristic activities are employed in the different practices (e.g. conveying information, giving advice or reflecting on interactants' interpretations of events or relationships, inviting introspection, ...)?; (2) What linguistic strategies are employed to achieve these activities?; (3) What is the relation between the patterns of linguistic strategies and the creation of interpersonal effects (e.g. solidarity, empathy, power, the therapeutic alliance)? The close collaboration and continual exchange of results between both parts of the project will provide important insights into the dynamic, discursive construction of two online health communication practices from a distinctly linguistic perspective, will add to linguistic theory in the field of interpersonal pragmatics, and will be useful for practitioners.

Project cover

Life (Beyond) Writing: Illness Narratives

Research Project  | 5 Project Members

This research project explores the social and cultural meanings of illness narratives and analyses their role and function in the literary, linguistic, and medical field. Thus, illness narratives will be approached from the three different disciplines, literary studies, linguistics, and medicine. Life writing (autobiographical) texts are omnipresent in our lives and play a crucial role in doctor-patient communication, in literature, and in everyday linguistic situations. The importance of narrative in the medical field has become acknowledged, but most doctors are not trained to be susceptible to specific linguistic and literary uses in their patients' stories. Thus, it is necessary to integrate literary and linguistic issues into the curriculum at medical schools to approach illness more holistically. In addition, numerous recent illness narratives by patients/writers provide new insights that go beyond the biomedical dimension of an illness, and with their aesthetic impact express additional aspects of human experience such as illness. A linguistic analysis of narratives by Swiss medical students on a case history and comparative corpora from English and American students will offer crucial information on the ways in which future doctors interpret a patient's narrative and reflect their own situation. The results of both the linguistic and literary analyses will be used to improve current and develop future training for communicative skills for both medical students and practicing doctors and thus has a direct applied impact for the medical humanities . Furthermore, the students will improve their narrative competence and learn to pay heed to otherwise hidden, yet crucial information on a more encompassing context of illness. The interrelation between the three disciplines will thus be manifold in that both fields of linguistics and literature will work on data derived from the field of medicine and will let their results flow back into the field of medicine.

Project cover

Relational work in Facebook

Research Project  | 2 Project Members

This project analyses language use in the profile pages and Status Updates of 74 Facebook users from Switzerland and 58 from Great Britain. The aim of the study is to explore how users create identities through language, i.e., what ‘acts of positioning’ (Davies and Harré 1990) they engage in, and how this practice is linked to relational work. We base our work on a post-modernist understanding of identity, which sees identity as fluid, dynamic, and as constructed by individuals in interaction (Bucholtz and Hall 2005) through linguistic, para- and extralinguistic means. We maintain that when individuals use language in interaction they are performing acts of positioning, since they are underlining the existence of a particular self which can be observed by others at a specific moment in time (Davies and Harré 1990). Within such a public space, where acts of positioning are performed in front of witnesses, the positioning of self and other becomes even more interesting, since by claiming 'I am a friend of x', for example, I am also positioning ‘x as a friend of mine’.


A systematic quantitative and qualitative analysis of the profile pages and Status Updates of our pilot study group (10 users from Switzerland and 10 users from Great Britain) has shown that Facebookers employ a variety of implicit and explicit acts of positioning. Furthermore, our study shows that Status Updates are used for primarily assertive and expressive purposes (cf. Nastri, Peña and Hancock 2006), or more specifically to provide information on one’s state of mind (e.g., happy, angry, etc.), to refer to actions in progress, to refer to future actions, and to reflect on past events. Within these realisations of speech act types individuals do identity work, i.e., they construct their identities as students, employees, wives, etc.


This project contributes to work on interactional sociolinguistics which emphasises the importance of appreciating what categories individuals find meaningful or important themselves. Facebook offers interesting possibilities in this regard, since in this particular computer-mediated context we find the practice of self-labelling; individuals use the profile pages and Status Updates to “type [themselves] into being” (Sundén, 2003:3, as quoted in Boyd and Ellison 2007).