[FG] Forensic Genetics

Senst, Alina et al. (2024) ‘Application of the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer instrument as quality control for next‐generation sequencing’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 69(6), pp. 2192–2196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15601.

Senst, A. et al. (2024) ‘Application of the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer instrument as quality control for next‐generation sequencing’, Journal of Forensic Sciences [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15601.

Hogg, J. et al. (2024) ‘Targeted recovery of male cells in a male and female same-cell mixture’, Journal of Forensic Sciences [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15514.

Schulte, Janine et al. (2024) ‘DEPArray™ single-cell technology: A validation study for forensic applications’, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 70, p. 103026. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103026.

Schulte, Janine et al. (2024) ‘Exploring the potential of genetic analysis in historical blood spots for patients with iodine-deficient goiter and thyroid carcinomas in Switzerland and Germany (1929–1989)’, BMC Medical Genomics, 17(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-024-01947-y.

Schulz, I., Schulte, J. and Dipl-Med, D.W. (2024) ‘Zygotic-splitting after in vitro fertilization and prenatal parenthood testing after suspected embryo mix-up – a case report’, International Journal of Legal Medicine [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03245-9.

Schulte, J. et al. (2023) ‘Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis’, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 68(4), pp. 1133–1147. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15305.

Währer J et al. (2023) ‘The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.’, Forensic science international. Genetics, 64, p. 102830. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102830.

Senst A et al. (2023) ‘Recommendations for the successful identification of altered human remains using standard and emerging technologies: Results of a systematic approach.’, Forensic science international. Genetics, 62, p. 102790. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102790.

Senst, Alina et al. (2023) ‘Recommendations for the successful identification of altered human remains using standard and emerging technologies: Results of a systematic approach’, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 62, p. 102790. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102790.

Egger S et al. (2022) ‘Technical note: Comparison of forensic swabs for intravaginal sampling.’, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society, 62(4), pp. 418–423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.05.006.

Seiberle I et al. (2022) ‘Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.’, Forensic science international. Genetics, 59, p. 102716. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102716.

Senst A et al. (2022) ‘Validation and beyond: Next generation sequencing of forensic casework samples including challenging tissue samples from altered human corpses using the MiSeq FGx system.’, Journal of forensic sciences, 67(4), pp. 1382–1398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15028.

Senst A et al. (2021) ‘Which tissue to take? A retrospective study of the identification success of altered human remains’, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 84, p. 102271. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102271.

Egger S. et al. (2021) ‘Erratum to: Erroneous sex typing due to partial deletion of the Y chromosome (Rechtsmedizin, (2020), 30, 2, (94-100), 10.1007/s00194-020-00373-5) Erratum zu: Fehlerhafte Geschlechtsbestimmung aufgrund partieller Deletion des Y-Chromosoms (Rechtsmedizin, (2020), 30, 2, (94-100), 10.1007/s00194-020-00373-5)’, Rechtsmedizin, 31(3), p. 216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-021-00486-5.

Ralf A et al. (2020) ‘Identification and characterization of novel rapidly mutating Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat markers’, Human Mutation, 41(9), pp. 1680–1696. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24068.

Egger S. et al. (2020) ‘Erroneous sex typing due to partial deletion of the Y chromosome Fehlerhafte Geschlechtsbestimmung aufgrund partieller Deletion des Y-Chromosoms’, Rechtsmedizin, 30(2), pp. 94–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-020-00373-5.

Schulz I, Egger S and Senst A (2020) ‘Die Rolle des Speichels in der forensischen Genetik’, in Filippi, Andreas; Waltimo, Tuomas (ed.) Speichel. (Speichel).

Rolf B and Schulz I (2007) ‘Theorie und Praxis der Abstammungsbegutachtung mit molekularbiologischen Methoden.’, in A. Spickhoff; D. Schwab; D. Henrich; P. Gottwald (ed.) Streit um die Abstammung . Gieseking-Verlag (Streit um die Abstammung ), pp. 83–91.

Schulz I et al. (2006) ‘Examination of postmortem animal interference to human remains using cross-species multiplex PCR.’, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2(2), pp. 95–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1385/fsmp:2:2:95.

Schulz I, Schneider PM and Rothschild MA (2006) ‘Absolute quantification of forensic casework samples using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) methods’, International Congress Series. 20.04.2006, 1288, pp. 765–767. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.09.183.