Zabel, F., Knüttel, M. and Poschlod, B. (2024) ‘CropSuite – A comprehensive open-source crop suitability model considering climate variability for climate impact assessment’. Copernicus GmbH. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2526.

Nelson, G.C. et al. (2024) ‘Adaptation to climate change and limits in food production systems: Physics, the chemistry of biology, and human behavior’, Global Change Biology, 30(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17489.

Orlov, A. et al. (2024) ‘Human heat stress could offset potential economic benefits of CO2 fertilization in crop production under a high-emissions scenario’, One Earth, 7(7), pp. 1250–1265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.012.

Müller, Christoph et al. (2024) ‘Substantial Differences in Crop Yield Sensitivities Between Models Call for Functionality-Based Model Evaluation’, Earth’s Future, (3), p. e2023EF003773. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ef003773.

Heimann, T. et al. (2024) ‘Phasing out palm and soy oil biodiesel in the EU: What is the benefit?’, GCB Bioenergy, 16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13115.

Heimann, T. and Delzeit, R. (2024) ‘Land for fish: Quantifying the connection between the aquaculture sector and agricultural markets’, Ecological Economics, 217. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108090.

Schneider, Julia M. et al. (2024) ‘Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies’, Nature Sustainability [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01410-x.

Piipponen, J. et al. (2023) ‘Protein and energy from grazing or crops - does livestock have a chance?’ Research Square Platform LLC. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3392089/v1.

Zabel, F. and Poschlod, B. (2023) ‘The Teddy tool v1.1: temporal disaggregation of daily climate model data for climate impact analysis’, Geoscientific Model Development, 16(18), pp. 5383–5399. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5383-2023.

Molina Bacca, Edna J. et al. (2023) ‘Uncertainty in land-use adaptation persists despite crop model projections showing lower impacts under high warming’, Communications Earth & Environment [Preprint], (1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00941-z.

Schneider, J.M., Zabel, F. and Mauser, W. (2022) ‘Global inventory of suitable, cultivable and available cropland under different scenarios and policies’, Scientific Data, 9(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01632-8.

Ganzenmüller, R. et al. (2022) ‘Land-use change emissions based on high-resolution activity data substantially lower than previously estimated’, Environmental Research Letters, 17(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac70d8.

Leclere, D. et al. (2022) ‘Effects of crop growing season length adaptation on economic climate change impacts in the agricultural sector’. Copernicus GmbH. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-11129.

Delzeit, Ruth and Schmidt, Alena (2022) ‘Wie wirkt sich der globale Wandel auf die Landnutzung aus? - Die neue Forschungsgruppe ‘Globale und Regionale Landnutzungsänderungen’ stellt sich vor.’, Regio Basiliensis, 63(1), pp. 27–33. Available at: https://www.gegbasel.ch/regio-basiliensis-archiv.

Mehrabi, Zia et al. (2022) ‘Research priorities for global food security under extreme events’, One Earth, 5(7), pp. 756–766. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.008.

Schneider, Julia M. et al. (2022) ‘Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets’, PLoS ONE, 17(2), p. e0263063. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263063.

Schuenemann, Franzsika and Delzeit, Ruth (2022) ‘Potentials, subsidies and tradeoffs of cellulosic ethanol in the European Union’, Ecological economics, 195, p. 107384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107384.

Schmidt, A. et al. (2021) ‘A food tax only minimally reduces the N surplus of Swiss agriculture’, Agricultural Systems, 194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103271.

Zabel, F. et al. (2021) ‘Large potential for crop production adaptation depends on available future varieties’, Global Change Biology, 27(16), pp. 3870–3882. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15649.

Dantas, Ianna Raissa Moreira, Delzeit, Ruth and Klepper, Gernot (2021) ‘Economic Research on the Global Allocation of Scarce Water Resources Needs Better Data’, Water Economics and Policy, 07(03), p. 2150013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2382624x21500132.

Delzeit, Ruth et al. (2021) ‘Scenarios for an impact assessment of global bioeconomy strategies: Results from a co-design process’, Research in Globalization, 3, p. 100060. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100060.

Schmidt, Alena et al. (2021) ‘Reduction of nitrogen pollution in agriculture through nitrogen surplus quotas: an analysis of individual marginal abatement cost and different quota allocation schemes using an agent-based model’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(8), pp. 1375–1391. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1823344.

Thuebe, Sneha D., Delzeit, Ruth and Henning, Christian H. C. A. (2021) ‘Economic gains from global cooperation in fulfilling climate pledges’, Energy Policy, 160, p. 112673. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112673.

Cronin, J. et al. (2020) ‘Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land-use’, GCB Bioenergy, 12(8), pp. 648–665. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12697.

Jagermeyr, J. et al. (2020) ‘A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(13), pp. 7071–7081. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919049117.

Zabel, F. et al. (2019) ‘Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity’, Nature Communications, 10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z.

Degife, A.W., Zabel, F. and Mauser, W. (2019) ‘Land use scenarios and their effect on potential crop production: The case of gambella region, Ethiopia’, Agriculture (Switzerland), 9(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9050105.

Degife, A.W., Zabel, F. and Mauser, W. (2018) ‘Assessing land use and land cover changes and agricultural farmland expansions in Gambella Region, Ethiopia, using Landsat 5 and Sentinel 2a multispectral data’, Heliyon, 4(11). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00919.

Meier, J., Zabel, F. and Mauser, W. (2018) ‘A global approach to estimate irrigated areas - A comparison between different data and statistics’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(2), pp. 1119–1133. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1119-2018.

Delzeit, R. et al. (2018) ‘Global economic-biophysical assessment of midterm scenarios for agricultural markets - Biofuel policies, dietary patterns, cropland expansion, and productivity growth’, Environmental Research Letters, 13(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9da2.

Delzeit, R. et al. (2017) ‘Addressing future trade-offs between biodiversity and cropland expansion to improve food security’, Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), pp. 1429–1441. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0927-1.

Mauser, W. et al. (2015) ‘Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion’, Nature Communications, 6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9946.

Zabel, F., Putzenlechner, B. and Mauser, W. (2014) ‘Global agricultural land resources - A high resolution suitability evaluation and its perspectives until 2100 under climate change conditions’, PLoS ONE, 9(9). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107522.

Zabel, F. and Mauser, W. (2013) ‘2-way coupling the hydrological land surface model PROMET with the regional climate model MM5’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(5), pp. 1705–1714. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1705-2013.