Theoretische Philosophie

Fasko, M. (2024) ‘Slavery and Race: Philosophical Debates in the Eighteenth Century’, Critical Philosophy of Race, 12(2), pp. 419–426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.12.2.0419.

Fasko, Manuel and West, Peter (2024) Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Edited by Fasko, Manuel;West, Peter. De Gruyter. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111197586.

Fasko, Manuel (2024) ‘Discussion of Deborah Boyle’s Mary Shepherd: a guide’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, pp. 1–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2023.2285770.

Fasko, Manuel (2024) ‘Resemblance and Representation: The Complexity of Berkeley’s Notion of Likeness and Mental Representation’, in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. De Gruyter (Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs), pp. 49–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111197586-006.

Fasko, Manuel and West, Peter (2024) ‘Introduction’, in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. De Gruyter (Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs), pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111197586-003.

Fasko, Manuel (2023) ‘Jones, Tom. George Berkeley: A Philosophical Life . Princeton / Oxford: Princeton University Press 2021, xxi + 622 pp.’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 105(4), pp. 685–688. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2021-0001.

Fasko, Manuel (2023) ‘“The compound mass we term SELF” : Mary Shepherd on selfhood and the difference between mind and self’, European Journal of Philosophy [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12898.

Stephanie Schuster (2023) ‘Aesthetic Deep Time Experiences of Temporal Sublime Nature’, The Polish Journal of Aesthetics, 2-3(69-70), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19205/69-70.23.1.

Fasko, Manuel (2022) ‘Questioning Authority: Anthony Collins” Challenge to Orthodox Anglican Authority Figures & George Berkeley’s Reply’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, p. forthcoming.

Fasko, Manuel (2022) ‘Two hostile Bishops? A Reexamination of the Relationship between Peter Browne and George Berkeley beyond their alleged Controversy’, Intellectual History Review, p. forthcoming. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2031519.

Fasko, Manuel (2022) ‘“God said ‘Let us make man in our image after our likeness’” - Mary Shepherd, the imago-dei-thesis, and the human mind’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 31(3), pp. 469–490. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2022.2154194.

Leuenberger, Muriel (2022) ‘Memory Modification and Authenticity: A Narrative Approach’, Neuroethics, 15(1), p. 10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09489-9.

Müller, Nico Dario (2022) Kantianism for Animals: A Radical Kantian Animal Ethic, The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan (The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01930-2.

Müller, Nico Dario (2022) ‘Korsgaard’s Duties Towards Animals: Two Difficulties’, Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism, 10(1), pp. 9–25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2022-01-mull.

Cueni, Damian and Queloz, Matthieu (2021) ‘Whence the Demand for Ethical Theory?’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 58(2), pp. 134–145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/48614001.

Fasko, Manuel (2021) ‘The Retrieval of the Letter “To the Author of the Minute Philosopher” from September 9th, 1732’, Berkeley Studies, 29, pp. 24–29. Available at: https://berkeleystudies.philosophy.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu886/files/BS_29_Fasko.pdf.

Fasko, Manuel (2021) ‘Mary Shepherd’s Threefold ”Variety of Intellect’and its Role in Improving Education’, Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 19(3), pp. 185–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2021.0307.

Fasko, Manuel (2021) ‘Review: Stephen H. Daniel’s Berkeley and Early Modern Philosophy’, Berkeley Studies, 29, pp. 30–33. Available at: https://berkeleystudies.philosophy.fsu.edu/sites/g/files/upcbnu886/files/BS_29_Review.pdf.

Fasko, Manuel (2021) Die Sprache Gottes - George Berkeleys Auffassung des Naturgeschehens, Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Basel / Berlin: Schwabe Verlag (Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy). Available at: https://doi.org/10.24894/978-3-7965-4308-1.

Fasnacht, Hannah (2021) ‘The Narrative Aesthetics of Protest Images’, The Journal for the Philosophy of Language, Mind and the Arts, Vol.2(Issue 1), pp. 221–238.

King, Colin Guthrie (2021) ‘Word, thought, and object in De int. 14 and Metaphysics Γ3’, Studia Philosophica, 80, pp. 53–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24894/stph-en.2021.80004.

King, Colin Guthrie (2021) ‘Adversarial Argumentation and Common Ground in Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations’, Topoi-an international review of philosophy, 40(5), pp. 939–950. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09734-x.

Leuenberger, Muriel (2021) ‘Why Authenticity Hinges on Narrative Identity’, AJOB Neuroscience, 12(1), pp. 43–45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2020.1866109.

Leuenberger, Muriel (2021) ‘What is the Point of Being Your True Self? A Genealogy of Essentialist Authenticity’, Philosophy, 96(3), pp. 409–431. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819121000012.

Leuenberger, Muriel (2021) ‘Losing Meaning: Philosophical Reflections on Neural Interventions and their Influence on Narrative Identity’, Neuroethics, 14(3), pp. 491–505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09469-5.

Müller, Nico (2021) ‘Samuel Camenzind: Wenn Tiere bloße Mittel zum Zweck sind’, Tierstudien, 20, pp. 169–171.

Schmid, Jelscha (2021) ‘Philosophical fictions: Maimon’s methodological response to Kant’, in C. Serck-Hanssen & B. Himmelmann (ed.). De Gruyter: De Gruyter.

Schmid, Jelscha (2021) ‘Fictions of systematicity: Maimon’s quest for a scientific method of philosophy’, Philosophers” imprint, 21(36), pp. 1–21.

van den Brandeler, Emnée (2021) ‘The political turn of the animal ethical discourse - the need for a virtue ethical approach’, in Schübel, Hanna; Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo (ed.). Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen Academic Publishers. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-915-2_26.

Zenker, Friederike (2021) Singuläre Tiere. Der Begriff der tierlichen Singularität in Tierethik, Fotografie und Film. . Translated by Wild Markus. Dissertation.

King, Colin Guthrie (2021) ‘Δόξαι and the tools of dialectic in De an. I.1-3’, in Gregoric, Pavel; Fink, Jakob Leth (ed.) Encounters with Aristotelian philosophy of mind. New York/London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (Encounters with Aristotelian philosophy of mind), pp. 15–42.

Markus Wild (2021) ‘Portmann, Goethe and Modern Biology: Two and a Half Ways of Looking at Nature’’, in F. Jaros (ed.) Adolf Portmann: A Thinker of Self-expressive Life. Cham: Springer (Adolf Portmann: A Thinker of Self-expressive Life), pp. 145–158.

Wild, Markus (2021) ‘Naturrechtliche Grundlagen der Troxlerschen Rechtslehre’, in Hilmer, Brigitte; Orland, Barbara (ed.) Ignaz Paul Vital Troxler. Philosophische Kontexte und Perspektiven. Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog (problemata), p. ***–***.

Wild, Markus (2021) ‘Intentionalität und Empfindung bei Tieren’, in Lintner, Martin (ed.) Mensch - Tier - Gott. Baden-Baden: Nomos (Interdisziplinäre Tierethik | Interdisciplinary Animal Ethics), pp. 113–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907084-113.

Bartos, Hynek and King, Colin Guthrie (2020) Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fasko, Manuel and West, Peter (2020) ‘The Irish Context of Berkeley’s “Resemblance Thesis”’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 88, pp. 7–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246120000089.

Fasko, M. and West, P. (2020) ‘Molyneux’s question: The Irish debates’. Taylor and Francis, pp. 122–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020377-10.

King, Colin Guthrie (2020) ‘Jason W. Carter: Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology. The Science of the Soul.’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 58(2), pp. 400–401.

King, Colin Guthrie (2020) ‘Hamid Taieb, Relational Intentionality: Brentano and the Aristotelian Tradition’, Ancient Philosophy Today: DIALOGOI, 2(2), pp. 183–189.

Leuenberger, Muriel (2020) ‘In Defense of Narrative Authenticity’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29(4), pp. 656–667. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180120000407.

Magouras, Ioannis et al. (2020) ‘Emerging Zoonotic Diseases: Should We Rethink the Animal-Human Interface?’, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, p. 582743. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.582743.

Martin, Angela and Rivas Velarde, Minerva (2020) ‘Discussing Ethical Issues Arising from Disability’, Bioethica Forum, 13(1), pp. 3–4.

Fasko, Manuel and West, Peter (2020) ‘Molyneux’s Question: The Irish Debates’, in Ferretti, Gabriele; Glenney, Brian (ed.) Molyneux’s Question and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge (Rewriting the History of Philosophy), pp. 125–125.

King, Colin Guthrie (2020) ‘Ancient philosophy at the cross-roads of metaphysics and medicine’, in Bartos, Hynek; King, Colin Guthrie (ed.) Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (Heat, pneuma, and soul in ancient philosophy and science), pp. 3–20.

Markus Wild (2020) ‘What Is Biological About Aristotelian Naturalism?’, in M. Hähnel (ed.) Aristotelian Naturalism. A Research Companion. Dordrecht: Springern (Aristotelian Naturalism. A Research Companion), pp. 127–143.

Martin, Angela (2020) ‘Haben Tiere Rechte? Tom Regan’, in Müller-Salo, Johannes (ed.) Analytische Philosophie. Eine Einführung in 16 Fragen und Antworten. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink (UTB), pp. 253–268.

Martin, Angela (2020) ‘Vulnérabilité animale’, in Larue, Renan (ed.) La Pensée végane. 50 regards sur la condition animale. Paris: Presses universitaires de France PUF (La Pensée végane. 50 regards sur la condition animale), pp. 613–620.

Queloz, Matthieu (2020) ‘Revealing Social Functions through Pragmatic Genealogies’, in Hufendiek, Rebekka; James, Daniel; Van Riel, Raphael (ed.) Social Functions in Philosophy: Metaphysical, Normative, and Methodological Perspectives. London: Routledge (Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy), pp. 200–218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429435393-11.

Schmid, Jelscha (2020) ‘»Es ist so, weil ich es so mache.« Fichtes Methode der Konstruktion’, in Klotz, Christian; d’Alfonso, Matteo Vincenzo (ed.) Fichtes Bildtheorie im Kontext, Teil II. Systematische Funktionen des Bildbegriffs. Leiden: Brill Rodopi (Fichte-Studien), pp. 389–412. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004422544_022.

Wild, Markus (2020) ‘Heidegger and Trakl: Language speaks in the Poet’s Poem’, in Figal, Günter; D’Angelo, Diego; Keiling, Tobias; Yang, Guang (ed.) Paths in Heidegger’s Later Thought. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (Studies in continental thought), pp. 45–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxcrxjn.5.

Wild, Markus (2020) ‘Animal Turn, Tierphilosophie und Animal Mainstreaming’, in Jaeger, Friedrich (ed.) Menschen und Tiere. Grundlagen und Herausforderungen der Human-Animal Studies. Stuttgart: Metzler (Cultural animal studies), pp. 57–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05625-2_4.

Wild, Markus (2020) ‘Conceptual Thought Without Language? The Case from Animal Cognition’, in Demmerling, Christoph; Schröder, Dirk (ed.) Concepts in Thought, Action, and Emotion: New Essays. New York: Routledge (Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy), pp. 99–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429455889-8.

Zenker, Friederike (2020) ‘Bilder der Fürsorge. Visionen und Brüche in den Mensch-Tier-Beziehungen’, in Ullrich, Jessica; Rieger, Stefan (ed.) Tiere und/als Medien. Berlin: Neofelis (Tierstudien), pp. 148–157.

Haag, Johannes and Wild, Markus (2019) Philosophie der Neuzeit. Von Descartes bis Kant. München: C.H. Beck.

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2019) ‘Affordances and the normativity of emotions’, Synthese, 194(11), pp. 4455–4476. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1144-7.

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2019) ‘Die Entstehung der Moral, der Begriff der Moral und das Bild von der Natur des Menschen’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 73(2), pp. 183–208. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3196/0044330826489487.

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2019) ‘Das Hypothesenwesen. Die genealogische Methode bei Nietzsche und Rée’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 67(3), pp. 440–450. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2019-0035.

King, Colin Guthrie (2019) ‘Commentary on Szaif’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 34, pp. 179–186.

Martin, Angela (2019) ‘Animal Vulnerability and its Ethical Implications: An Exploration’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, pp. 1–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12390.

Queloz, Matthieu (2019) ‘Nietzsches affirmative Genealogien’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 67(3), pp. 429–439. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2019-0034.

Queloz, Matthieu (2019) ‘From Paradigm-Based Explanation to Pragmatic Genealogy’, MIND [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy083.

Queloz, Matthieu (2019) ‘The Points of Concepts: Their Types, Tensions, and Connections’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(8), pp. 1122–1145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2019.1584940.

Queloz, Matthieu and Cueni, Damian (2019) ‘Nietzsche as a Critic of Genealogical Debunking: Making Room for Naturalism without Subversion’, The Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry, 102(3), pp. 277–297.

Müller, Nico Dario (2019) ‘Animal Boredom’, in Thompson, Paul B.; Kaplan, David M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics. Dordrecht: Springer (Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics), pp. 193–197. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1179-9_604.

Wild, Markus (2019) ‘Meinen Sie Zürich zum Beispiel? Beispiele sind Exemplifikationen’, in Klammer, Markus; Cremonini, Andreas (ed.) Bild-Beispiele. Zu einer pikturalen Logik des Exemplarischen. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink (Eikones), pp. 25–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846762158_003.

Wild, Markus (2019) ‘Nietzsches Perspektivismus’, in von Sass, Hartmut (ed.) Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik. Hamburg: Felix Meiner (Blaue Reihe), pp. 37–60.

Wild, Markus (2019) ‘Animal Mainstreaming. Motivation und Bedeutung eines neuen Konzepts in der Tierethik’, in Diehl, Elke; Tuider, Jens (ed.) Haben Tiere Rechte? Aspekte und Dimensionen der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Schriftenreihe), pp. 323–335.

Fasko, Manuel (2018) ‘A Scotist Nonetheless? George Berkeley, Cajetan, and the Problem of Divine Attributes’, Ruch Filozoficzny, 74(4), pp. 33–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12775/rf.2018.035.

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2018) ‘Explaining embodied emotions - with and without representations’, Philosophical Explorations, 21(2), pp. 319–331. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2018.1477985.

King, Colin Guthrie (2018) ‘Aristotle’s Categories in the 19th Century’, New Studies in the History and Historiography of Philosophy, 4, pp. 11–36.

Müller, Nico (2018) ‘[Rezension:] Maja Schepelmann: Kants Gesamtwerk in neuer Perspektive’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Literatur, 6(2), pp. 40–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21827/zfphl.6.2.35426.

Queloz, Matthieu (2018) ‘Williams’s Pragmatic Genealogy and Self-Effacing Functionality’, Philosophers” Imprint, 18(17), pp. 1–20. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0018.017.

Queloz, Matthieu (2018) ‘Davidsonian Causalism and Wittgensteinian Anti-Causalism: A Rapprochement’, Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 5(6), pp. 153–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.006.

Queloz, Matthieu (2018) ‘How Genealogies Can Affect the Space of Reasons’, Synthese, p. 23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1777-9.

Queloz, Matthieu (2018) ‘Genealogy and Knowledge-First Epistemology: A Mismatch?’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 69(274), pp. 100–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqy041.

Queloz, Matthieu (2018) The Practical Origins of Concepts: Pragmatic Genealogy from Hume and Nietzsche to Craig and Williams. . Translated by Wild Markus; Kusch Martin. Dissertation.

Schmid, Jelscha (2018) ‘Schelling’s method of Darstellung: Presenting nature through experiment’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 69, pp. 12–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.009.

Schmid, Jelscha (2018) ‘Disordered existentiality: Mental illness and Heidegger’s philosophy of Dasein’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), pp. 485–502. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9523-1.

Wild, Markus (2018) ‘Empathie, Mitleid und warum Nietzsche nichts damit anfangen konnte. Für und Gegen Empathie’, in Breitenstein, Urs (ed.) Empathie - individuell und kollektiv: Interdisziplinäre Veranstaltungen der Aeneas-Silvius-Stiftung. Basel: Schwabe (Vorträge der Aeneas-Silvius-Stiftung an der Universität Basel), pp. 47–62.

Fasko, Manuel (2017) ‘The Demystification of Nick Zangwill’s ‘Myth of Religious Experience’’, Open Theology, 3(1), pp. 370–379. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2017-0029.

Müller, Nico (2017) ‘Saskia Stucki: Die tierliche Rechtsperson: Warum und wie?’, Tierstudien, 11, pp. 161–163.

Queloz, Matthieu (2017) ‘Nietzsche’s Pragmatic Genealogy of Justice’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(4), pp. 727–749. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2016.1266462.

Queloz, Matthieu (2017) ‘Two Orders of Things: Wittgenstein on Reasons and Causes’, Philosophy, 92(3), pp. 369–397. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819117000055.

Queloz, Matthieu (2017) ‘Does Philosophy Have a Vindicatory History? Bernard Williams on the History of Philosophy’, Studia Philosophica: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 76, pp. 137–152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24894/stph-en.2017.76008.

Sievers, Christine, Wild, Markus and Gruber, Thibaud (2017) ‘Intentionality and Flexibility in Animal Communication’, in Andrews, Kristin; Beck, Jacob (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds. London: Routledge (Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy), pp. 333–342. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742250.

Wild, Markus (2017) ‘Was ist biologisch am Aristotelischen Naturalismus?’, in Hähnel, Martin (ed.) Aristotelischer Naturalismus. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler (Aristotelischer Naturalismus), pp. 89–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04333-7_6.

Grimm, Herwig and Wild, Markus (2016) Tierethik zur Einführung, Zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius (Zur Einführung).

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2016) Embodied emotions : a naturalist approach to a normative phenomenon, Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy).

Queloz, Matthieu (2016) ‘The Double Nature of DNA: Reevaluating the Common Heritage Idea’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(1), pp. 47–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12063.

Queloz, Matthieu (2016) ‘Wittgenstein on the Chain of Reasons’, Wittgenstein-Studien, 7(1), pp. 105–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2016-0108.

Townsend, Simon W. et al. (2016) ‘Exorcising Grice`s ghost: an empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals’, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 92(3), pp. 1427–1433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12289.

Wild, Markus (2016) ‘Tierrechte durch Interessen. Zur ethischen Beziehung zwischen Mensch und Tier’, Ethik und Unterricht, (4), pp. 6–10.

Hufendiek, Rebekka (2016) ‘William James and John Dewey on Embodied Action-Oriented Emotions’, in Madzia, Roman; Jung, Matthias (ed.) Pragmatism and the Embodied Cognitive Sciences. From Bodily Interaction to Symbolic Articulation. Berlin: De Gruyter (Humanprojekt), pp. 269–288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110480238-014.

Wild, Markus (2016) ‘Warum es besser ist kein Fleisch zu essen. Moralische Urteile, Überlegungsgleichgewicht und Willensschwäche’, in Fehlmann, Meret; Michel, Margot; Niederhauser, Rebecca (ed.) Tierisch! Das Tier und die Wissenschaft. Ein Streifzug durch die Disziplinen. Zürich: vdf Hochschulvlg (Zürcher Hochschulforum), pp. 59–72.

Wild, Markus (2016) ‘Philosophische Implikationen der Kognitiven Ethologie’, in Köchy, Kristian; Wunsch, Matthias; Böhnert, Martin (ed.) Philosophie der Tierforschung, Band 2: Maximen und Konsequenzen. Freiburg i.Br.: Karl Alber Verlag (Philosophie der Tierforschung, Band 2: Maximen und Konsequenzen), pp. 163–194.

Queloz, Matthieu and Cueni, Damian (2015) ‘Warum die liberale Demokratie laufend verteidigt werden muss’. Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen. Available at: http://www.srf.ch/kultur/gesellschaft-religion/warum-die-liberale-demokratie-laufend-verteidigt-werden-muss.

Schmid, Jelscha (2015) ‘Andreas Heinz: Der Begriff der psychischen Krankheit’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Literatur, 3(2), pp. 41–48. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21827/zfphl.3.2.35361.

Hufendiek, Rebekka and Wild, Markus (2015) ‘Faculties and Modularity’, in Perler, Dominik (ed.) The Faculties. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Philosophical Concepts), pp. 254–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199935253.003.0010.

Hufendiek, Rebekka and Wild, Markus (2015) ‘Faculties and Phrenology’, in Perler, Dominik (ed.) The Faculties. Oxford: Oxford University Press (Oxford Philosophical Concepts), pp. 247–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199935253.003.0009.

Wild, Markus (2015) ‘Anthropologische Differenz’, in Borgards, Roland (ed.) Tiere: Kulturwissenschaftliches Handbuch. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler (Tiere: Kulturwissenschaftliches Handbuch), pp. 47–59.